• Español
  • English
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • rss
  • Español
  • English
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • rss
TNI D&D
  • Home
  • About us
    • About us
    • People
    • Partners
    • Researchers
    • Contact us
    • In the media
    • Newsletter
  • Newsroom
    • Press contacts
    • Press releases
    • Resources
    • Drugs in the news
  • Issues
    • Drug policy debate in the Americas
    • Decriminalization
    • Proportionality of sentences
    • Harm reduction
    • Reclassification of substances
    • Safer crack use
    • Human rights
    • Regulation
    • Unscheduling the coca leaf
    • Ending the war on drugs
    • Alternative development
    • Cannabis
    • Producers of Crops
    • Law enforcement
    • ATS, Mild stimulants & NPS
    • European Drug Policy
    • Money Laundering
  • UN Drug
    Control
    • Conventions
    • UNODC
    • CND
    • INCB
    • UNGASS
  • Country
    information
    • Drug Law Reform on the Map
    • Central America
      • El Salvador
      • Guatemala
      • Honduras
      • Costa Rica
    • Latin America
      • Argentina
      • Bolivia
      • Paraguay
      • Brazil
      • Chile
      • Colombia
      • Ecuador
      • Peru
      • Uruguay
      • Venezuela
    • Mexico
    • Caribbean
      • Jamaica
      • Belize
    • Afghanistan
  • Events
    • Expert Seminars
    • Informal Policy Dialogues
    • Public Events
    • Judges for Law Reform
  • Publications
    • Drug Policy Briefings
    • Drug Law Reform
    • Legislative Reform Series
    • The Human Face
    • Drugs & conflict
    • Drugs and the Law (CEDD)
      • Systems overload
    • Drug Markets and Violence
  • Weblog

 

Statement about the coca leaf

Statement in support of the Bolivian announcement to ask for the un-scheduling of the coca leaf from the list controlled substances of the 1961 UN Single Convention.

Transnational Institute / International Drug Policy Consortium (IDCP)

March 12, 2008

Thematic debate on the follow-up to the 20th special session of the General Assembly (UNGASS)
Agenda Item III Countering drugs supply
(i) areas requiring further action

NGO Contribution

Transnational Institute (Institute for Policy Studies)
Member of International Drug Policy Consortium

The resolution of ambiguities regarding the coca leaf

Since 1952 until 1988, the drug control system has criminalized the coca leaf. The 2007 Annual Report of the International Narcotics Control Board is by far the most aggressive since the 1961 Single Convention, which proclaimed the elimination of traditional use in 25 years. The 1988 Convention re-acknowledged this ancestral practice.

As a result of the 2006 INCB report (that gave clear signals regarding the Board’s concerns over Bolivia’s national policy towards the coca leaf) the Bolivian government extended an invitation to the Board to visit the country in order to enlighten them on their new strategy on drugs control and coca leaf policies. The 2006 report had expressed concerns that these policies "could serve as a precedent and may send the wrong message to the public if it is allowed to stand".[1] Bolivian governments have protested against this for decades.

Although the Board’s visit was interpreted as generally positive on the Bolivian side, the 2007 INCB report shows no signs of an increased sensitivity towards the Bolivian claim on the rights of their indigenous population, and the general public, to consume the coca leaf in a traditional manner by chewing the leaf, and even goes as far as to consider drinking coca tea, as "not in line with the provisions of the 1961 Convention". [2] The Board considers Bolivia, Peru and a few other countries [3] to allow such practises to be in breach with their treaty obligations, and insists, "each party to the Convention should establish as a criminal offence, when committed intentionally, the possession and purchase of coca leaf for personal consumption". [4]

The fact that this would involve prosecuting several million people does not seem to be proportional to the claimed crime, particularly since most consumers use the coca leaf for beneficial health purposes, and coca tea drinking a well-recognized practise to counter altitude sickness.

The absurd call by the Board contradicts their own forward to the report that talks about "respect for national sovereignty, for the various constitutional and other fundamental principles of domestic law - practice, judgements and procedures - and for the rich diversity of peoples, cultures, customs and values". [5]

Although the 1961 Convention established that "Coca leaf chewing must be abolished within twenty-five years from the coming into force of this Convention," [6] when this temporary rule came to its end, the then democratically elected governments of Bolivia and Peru managed to have part of the damage done reverted in the 1988 Convention, by having a partial recognition included, stating "The measures adopted shall respect fundamental human rights and shall take due account of traditional licit use, where there is historic evidence of such use". [7]

In this years report, the Board denies the validity of this article, or any reservation made by parties, since it does not "absolve a party of its rights and obligations under the other international drug control treaties" . [8]

The INCB makes its worst mistake to refer to the coca leaf with the false assumption that harm is inflicted upon people's health when consuming the coca leaf, when referring to "the role it plays in the progression of drug dependence". [9] This claim bears no scientific or medical evidence, and is exclusively based on a long forgotten and obsolete study done in 1950 in which racial prejudice and questionable methodologies were used. [10]

The approach adopted in the report towards this complex and sensitive issue demonstrates a surprising ignorance and insensitivity not suitable for a UN body, particularly following their visit to Bolivia, and after the recent adoption of the Declaration of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. For this reason, we support the announcement of Bolivia to ask for the un-scheduling of the coca leaf from the list controlled substances of the 1961 Convention.

References

1 INCB report 2006, paragraph 361

2 INCB report 2007, paragraph 217

3 Probably the Board is referring here to Argentina, Chile and Colombia, where chewing and tea drinking are practised by some groups and in certain regions of these countries.

4 INCB report 2007, paragraph 219

5 INCB report 2007, Foreword

6 Single Convention 1961, Article 49, Par 2 e)

7 United Nations Convention against the Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, 1988, article 14, paragraph 2.

8 INCB report 2007, paragraph 220

9 Idem, paragraph 48

10 Economic and Social Council: Official record Fifth year; twelfth session: Special supplement No11: report of the Commission of Enquiry on the Coca Leaf, May 1950. New York; United Nations, 1950 (E/1666-E/CN.7/AC.2/1)

  • Labels
    10-year Review | conventions | CND | UNGASS | coca | INCB | bolivia

Drugs in the News

  • PHE accused of toning down positive report on drug centres
    05.03.2021
  • Most French people in favour of legalising cannabis, parliamentary survey finds
    03.03.2021
  • Doctors call for safer cocaine supply
    03.03.2021
  • Could XTC-shops replace Amsterdam’s coffeeshops in the future?
    02.03.2021
  • House OKs bill that presumes drug suspects guilty until proven innocent
    02.03.2021
  • Washington Court decriminalizes drugs: Will lawmakers let it stand?
    02.03.2021
More news

Weblog

    A new EU Drug Strategy is being repared by the German presidencyA new EU Drug Strategy is being repared by the German presidency
    08.10.2020
More weblog

Hilites

Balancing Treaty Stability and Change

balancing hilite

Inter se modification of the UN drug control conventions to facilitate cannabis regulation


Connecting the dots...

connecting dots hilite

Human rights, illicit cultivation and alternative development


Morocco and Cannabis

morocco cannabis hilite

Reduction, containment or acceptance


The Rise and Decline of Cannabis Prohibition

rise decline hilite

The History of Cannabis in the UN Drug Control System and Options For Reform


Tags

10-year Review  20 1998 UNGASS  26 2005 CND debate  8 2016 UNGASS  126 2019 HLM  5 activism  21 afghanistan  24 show all

Tags

10-year Review  20 1998 UNGASS  26 2005 CND debate  8 2016 UNGASS  126 2019 HLM  5 activism  21 afghanistan  24 hide
africa  7 albania  11 alternative development  113 alternatives to policing  2 amnesty  63 appellation of origin  3 argentina  32 asean  9 ATS  15 australia  94 ayahuasca  6 bahamas  4 ballot 2012  155 banking  44 barbados  11 belgium  32 belize  10 bermuda  7 bolivia  115 brazil  93 brownfield doctrine  24 burma  42 california  201 cambodia  12 canada  496 cannabinoids  89 cannabis  2805 cannabis clubs  189 cannabis industry  365 caribbean  138 caricom  33 cbd oil  1 central america  5 chile  21 china  46 civil society  37 CND  126 coca  212 cocaine  61 coffee shop  211 cognitive decline  30 colombia  147 colorado  159 compulsary detention  19 conflict  3 conventions  250 corporate capture  8 corruption  3 costa rica  10 crack  51 craft cannabis  27 crime  67 czech republic  31 dark net  4 death penalty  2 decertification  1 decriminalization  832 deforestation  8 denmark  119 drug checking  35 drug consumption rooms  181 drug courts  22 drug markets  134 drug testing  7 drug trade  48 e-cigarettes  1 e-joint  2 ecstasy  59 ecuador  22 egypt  16 el salvador  2 environment  14 eradication  126 essential medicines  25 estonia  1 eswatini  4 european drug policy  67 expert advisory group  9 extrajudicial killings  92 fair trade  13 fentanyl  75 france  102 fumigation  25 gateway theory  29 georgia  2 germany  151 ghana  16 global commission  46 greece  18 guatemala  31 guatemala initiative  47 harm reduction  330 hemp  39 heroin  127 heroin assisted treatment  77 HIV/AIDS  61 home cultivation  79 honduras  3 human rights  247 illinois  10 incarceration  51 INCB  135 india  88 indonesia  34 informal drug policy dialogues  22 inter se modification  13 iran  14 ireland  15 israel  56 italy  34 jamaica  162 japan  3 kava  3 kazakhstan  5 ketamine  27 khat  36 kratom  27 kyrgyzstan  1 laos  2 latin american debate  115 law enforcement  382 lebanon  41 legal highs  63 legalization  1380 lesotho  6 luxembourg  33 malaysia  7 malta  17 medical cannabis  599 mental health  44 methamphetamine  41 mexico  203 Mid-Term Review  1 mild stimulants  37 money laundering  53 morocco  94 naloxone  13 nepal  6 netherlands  286 new york  20 new zealand  64 NIDA  5 nitrous oxide  6 norway  16 NPS  10 opinion polls  119 opioids  133 opium  90 oregon  29 overdose kits  4 pakistan  9 panama  5 paraguay  4 pardon  2 patents  18 peace  22 peru  42 peyote  3 philippines  86 pleasure  5 police pacification  18 portugal  66 potency  2 precursors  6 prevention  3 prison situation  96 producers  119 prohibition  141 proportionality  110 psychedelics  11 psychosis  53 puerto rico  3 racism  24 reclassification  116 recriminalisation  36 regulation  1196 russia  36 sacramental use  11 safe supply  20 safer crack  28 scheduling  24 scientific research  135 sdg  2 security  14 senegal  1 sentencing  66 singapore  6 social justice  55 south africa  64 spain  76 st lucia  7 st vincent and grenadines  29 substance-use disorder  18 substitution treatment  30 sweden  26 switzerland  133 synthetic cannabinoids  30 taxation  38 teen use  43 thailand  53 thresholds  38 tramadol  17 treatment  22 trinidad & tobago  15 tunisia  11 UK  251 UN drug control  422 UNGASS  58 UNODC  107 uruguay  143 US drug policy  1119 vaping  2 venezuela  5 vietnam  5 violence  131 WHO  60 world drug report  11

This website

UN Drug Control

In 2011 the 1961 UN Single Convention on drugs will be in place for 50 years. In 2012 the international drug control system will exist 100 years since the International Opium Convention was signed in 1912 in The Hague. Does it still serve its purpose or is a reform of the UN Drug Conventions needed? This site provides critical background.

Drug Law Reform on the map

dlronthemap_und

Copyright © 2016 Drug Law Reform in Latin America

Website by WebWolf