Lifting the ban on coca chewing

Bolivia’s proposal to amend the 1961 Single Convention
Series on Legislative Reform of Drug Policies Nr. 11
March 2011

dlr11January 31 marked the close of the 18-month period during which countries could submit objections to Bolivia’s proposal to remove from the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs the obligation to abolish the practice of coca chewing.

A total of eighteen countries formally notified the UN Secretary General that they could not accept the proposed amendment: the United States, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Canada, Denmark, Germany, the Russian Federation, Japan, Singapore, Slovakia, Estonia, France, Italy, Bulgaria, Latvia, Malaysia, Mexico and Ukraine.

application-pdfDownload the briefing (PDF)

The U.S. convened a group of ‘friends of the convention’ to rally against what they perceived to be an undermining of the ‘integrity’ of the treaty and its guiding principle to limit the trade and use of narcotic drugs exclusively to medical and scientific purposes. The UN Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC or the Council) will have to decide how to proceed, most likely during its substantive session in Geneva this July.

This briefing paper analyses the reasons behind the proposed amendment and the opposing arguments that have been brought forward, and outlines the various options to be considered as the fate of Bolivia’s proposal is determined. Simply rejecting the amendment will not make the issue disappear.

KEY POINTS

  • The ban on coca chewing is a violation of indigenous rights and needs to be lifted
  • The condemnation of coca leaf and traditional use by the 1961 Single Convention conflicts with the principles and provisions of later treaties and declarations
  • The whole of South America expressed support for Bolivia’s amendment proposal
  • The UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, in its advisory capacity to ECOSOC, recommends that Member States support this initiative
  • The opposing arguments brought forward in the eighteen objections to Bolivia’s proposal are dubious and contradictory
  • Rejecting the amendment will not make the issue disappear
  • A constructive dialogue is required to resolve the legal ambiguities one way or another
  • A WHO expert review of coca leaf is long overdue

See also: Objections and support for Bolivia's coca amendment

RecommendPrint

Publications

goto
A breakthrough in the making?
dlr21

Shifts in the Latin American drug policy debate

Read more...

Tags

show

This website

support-ec-osi-disclaimer-web

Other projects

UN Drug Control

In 2011 the 1961 UN Single Convention on drugs will be in place for 50 years. In 2012 the international drug control system will exist 100 years since the International Opium Convention was signed in 1912 in The Hague. Does it still serve its purpose or is a reform of the UN Drug Conventions needed? This site provides critical background.

TNI Drug Law Reform Project

Drug Law Reform in Latin America is a project of the TNI Drugs & Democracy programme
dd-logo
"Promoting a more effective and humane drug policy in Latin America"