• Español
  • English
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • rss
  • Español
  • English
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • rss
TNI D&D
  • Inicio
  • Quiénes
    somos
    • Quiénes somos
    • Personas
    • Partners
    • Investigadores
    • Datos de contacto
    • En la prensa
    • Newsletter
  • Sala de Prensa
    • Contactos de prensa
    • Comunicados de prensa
    • Recursos
    • Últimas noticias
  • Temas
    • Debate sobre políticas de drogas en las Américas
    • Descriminalización
    • Proporcionalidad de las penas
    • Reducción de daños
    • Reclasificación de sustancias
    • Consumo de crack más seguro
    • Derechos humanos
    • Regulación
    • Desclasificación de la hoja de coca
    • Fracaso de la guerra a las drogas
    • Dessarollo alternativo
    • Cannabis
    • Productores
    • Law enforcement
    • ATS, Mild stimulants & NPS
    • European Drug Policy
    • Lavado de dinero
  • Control
    de drogas
    • Convenciones
    • ONUDD
    • CdE
    • JIFE
    • UNGASS
  • Información
    por país
    • Mapa de la región
    • América Central
      • El Salvador
      • Guatemala
      • Honduras
      • Costa Rica
    • América Latina
      • Argentina
      • Bolivia
      • Paraguay
      • Brasil
      • Chile
      • Colombia
      • Ecuador
      • Perú
      • Uruguay
      • Venezuela
    • México
    • Caribbean
      • Jamaica
      • Belize
    • Afghanistan
  • Eventos
    • Seminarios de expertos
    • Diálogos Informales sobre Drogas
    • Eventos publicos
    • Magistrados proponen reforma
  • Publicaciones
    • Informes sobre políticas de drogas
    • Reformas a las leyes de drogas
    • Serie reforma legislativa
    • El rostro humano
    • Drugs & conflict
    • Drogas y Derecho (CEDD)
      • Sistemas sobrecargados
    • Mercados de drogas y violencia
  • Weblog

 

Draft Proposal United States

Draft Proposal by the United States, 27 November 1997 

FOR PARTICIPANTS ONLY
E/CN.7/1997/PC/CRP.9
27 November 1997
ORIGINAL: ENGLISH

COMMISSION ON NARCOTIC DRUGS ACTING AS PREPARATORY BODY FOR THE SPECIAL SESSION OF THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY DEVOTED TO THE FIGHT AGAINST THE ILLICIT PRODUCTION, SALE, DEMAND, TRAFFIC AND DISTRIBUTION OF NARCOTIC DRUGS AND PSYCHOTROPIC SUBSTANCES AND RELATED ACTIVITIES

Third informal open-ended inter-sessional meeting
Vienna, 5 December 1997
Item 2 of the provisional agenda*

ERADICATION OF ILLICIT NARCOTIC CROPS AND PROMOTION OF
ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES

Draft non-paper to be included in the declaration on implementing the 1988 United Nations Convention against-Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotic Substances

PROPOSAL BY THE UNITED STATES**

*E/CN.711997/PC/8.
**This document has not been edited.
V.97-28603


E/CN.7/1997/PC/CRP.9

Page 2

INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION ON ERADICATION OF ILLICIT DRUG CROPS AND PROMOTION OF ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMMES

Problem

Despite the adoption of international conventions promoting the prohibition of illicit drug crops the problem of cultivation of coca bush, opium poppy, and cannabis plant continues at alarming levels.

Action

1. States and their community leaders must strongly condemn the cultivation of coca bush, opium poppy, and cannabis plants as well as other illicit drug crops.

2. States and their community leaders should ensure that the specific commitments of

the United Nations conventions regarding illicit drug crop cultivation are implemented and enforced,

including:

the provisions of the 1961 Convention (and its 1972 Protocol) which calls upon member States to prohibit the cultivation of opium poppy, the coca bush, or the cannabis plant to protect the public health and welfare and prevent diversion into illicit traffic and to take measures to seize any plants illicitly cultivated;

the provision of the 1988 Convention which calls upon parties to adopt measures to establish as a criminal offense the cultivation of opium poppy, coca bush, or cannabis plant for the production of narcotic drugs contrary to the provisions of the 1961 Convention and that Convention as amended and to take appropriate measures to prevent illicit cultivation of and to eradicate plants containing narcotic or psychotropic substances.

3. States should commit to ending all illicit cultivation of opium poppy and coca bush by the year 2008, using all available means, including alternative development, eradication and law enforcement.

4. States with illicit drug cultivation should develop national strategies to implement the provisions of the 1961 Convention and article 14 of the 1988 Convention regarding the elimination of drug crops.


E/CN.7/1997/PC/CRP. 9

Page 3

Problem

History has shown that there is no single response to eliminating the cultivation and production of illicit drugs.

Action

5. National crop elimination strategies and programmes should include comprehensive measures such as programmes in alternative development, law enforcement and eradication.

6. National crop elimination strategies should include concrete measurable objectives.

Problem

Member States have often undertaken valiant efforts to eliminate the cultivation of opium poppy, coca bush, and cannabis plant. Nevertheless, in many cases, successes in eliminating illicit drug cultivation in one area have resulted in increased illicit cultivation of such crops in other regions or countries.

Action

7. States should cooperate through bilateral, regional and multilateral means to prevent drug organizations from moving cultivation from one area, region, or country to another.

8. States should share information on illicit drug crop assessments with UNDCP and other Governments in order to increase cooperation to eliminate such cultivation

Problem

Alternative development is an important component for generating and promoting lawful, viable, and sustainable economic options to illicit drug crop cultivation. Against this backdrop, countries with illicit drug crops will need to seek continued assistance to support national efforts to eliminate drug crops.

Action

9. Member States with illicit drug., crop cultivation should present national plans to potential donors, including from bilateral and multilateral donors such as the World Bank and relevant regional banks, and request assistance to support their efforts to eliminate drug crops.


E/CN.7/1997/PC/CP,P.9

Page 4

10. Donor nations and the relevant United Nations organizations should assist countries in countering illicit drug production by providing alternative development assistance with the objective of eliminating drug crops.

11. The international financial institutions and the regional development banks should provide loans and other assistance for alternative development programmes that have as their objective the elimination of drug crops.

Problem

Alternative development programmes are not necessarily interchangeable from country to country.

Action

12. National authorities and local communities should be involved when development and implementing alternative development projects.

13. Local economic, social and cultural characteristics of the communities receiving alternative development assistance should be taken into account when alternative development programmes are developed.

14. Alternative development programmes should, when possible and necessary, include:

  • sustainable development criteria;
  • market projects which rehabilitate existing agricultural economy, integrate pest management, and technology transfer;
  • institutional development support;
  • market opportunities for new licit crops by linking new legitimate producers with potential markets;
  • development of infrastructure such as roads and irrigation systems to encourage the abandonment of illicit crops;
  • employment opportunities in the non-agricultural sector, where economically viable;
  • close collaboration among, private investment, the inclusion of civil society, and non-governmental organizations.

E/CN.7/1997/PC/CRP.9

Page 5

15. UNDCP should promote efforts by the World Bank and regional banks to convene a series of regional donor conferences to seek resources for alterative development programmes in support of comprehensive crop control strategies.

16. Those countries that have experienced success in eliminating drug crops should share their experiences through UNDCP.

Problem

Even when development projects are successful, drug traffickers still have the resources to achieve many of their objectives. Large numbers of growers and processors are not likely to abandon the trade voluntarily simply because other opportunities exists; they must see that there is a risk associated with staying in illicit drug cultivation.

Action

17. Member States with illicit drug crop cultivation problems should ensure that sustainable development initiatives are backed, when necessary, by credible enforcement measures,

18. Comprehensive drug interdiction programmes can have disruptive efforts on the market that help drive down the price of illicitly cultivated drug crops and in so doing make alternative sources of legal income more competitive and attractive.

19. Under other circumstances, or when other strategies have not worked, States should consider deterrence measures such as eradication, destruction of illicit drug crops, arrests, as called for in the 1961 and 1988 Conventions.

20. Eradication efforts should utilize available research and ensure that environmentally safe methods are employed.


Últimas noticias

  • Los clubes de cannabis de Barcelona preparan una demanda millonaria contra el Ayuntamiento por su cierre
    12.01.2024
  • Sanidad retomará desde este mes la regulación del cannabis medicinal
    01.01.2024
  • El Ayuntamiento de Barcelona estrecha el cerco sobre los clubes de cannabis y busca la manera de cerrarlos todos
    31.12.2023
  • Las tiendas de cannabis en Nueva York generan 150 millones de dólares en su primer año
    29.12.2023
  • Pionera, pero no perfecta: 10 años de la legislación del cannabis de uso adulto en Uruguay
    25.12.2023
  • Países Bajos experimenta con la venta de cannabis cultivado legalmente en el país
    15.12.2023
Más noticias

Weblog

    Ceguera deliberada: La JIFE no encuentra nada bueno que decir sobre legalización 
del cannabis
    14.03.2023
Más weblog

Destacados

El equilibrio entre la estabilidad y el cambio

La modificación inter se de los tratados de fiscalización de drogas de la ONU para facilitar la regulación del cannabis


Vasos comunicantes...

vasos hilite2

Derechos humanos, cultivo ilícito y desarrollo alternativo


Amapola, opio y heroína

La producción de Colombia y México


Marruecos y el cannabis

Reducción, contención o aceptación


Tags

revisión de 10 años  26 UNGASS 1998  7 debate CND 2005  5 UNGASS 2016  75 2019 HLM  1 activism  10 afganistán  8 show all

Tags

revisión de 10 años  26 UNGASS 1998  7 debate CND 2005  5 UNGASS 2016  75 2019 HLM  1 activism  10 afganistán  8 hide
albania  2 desarrollo alternativo  135 amnesty  17 amsterdam  4 argentina  209 ETA  7 australia  5 ayahuasca  1 referendo 2012  33 sistema bancario  31 bélgica  14 belize  1 bermuda  2 bolivia  261 brasil  195 doctrina brownfield  12 birmania  11 california  54 canadá  87 cannabinoides  33 cannabis  1793 clubes de cannabis  510 industria del cannabis  103 el caribe  12 caricom  4 américa central  7 chile  85 china  4 sociedad civil  27 CND  92 coca  475 cocaína  50 coffee shop  64 declive cognitivo  5 colombia  501 colorado  25 internamiento obligatorio  46 conflict  2 convenciones  241 corporate capture  4 corruption  1 costa rica  9 pasta base  98 crimen  43 república checa  14 decertification  2 descriminalización  747 deforestation  2 dinamarca  13 drug checking  3 salas de consumo  57 tribunales de drogas  16 mercados de drogas  71 drug testing  2 drug tourism  1 tráfico de drogas  44 éxtasis  12 ecuador  63 egipto  2 el salvador  6 environment  8 erradicación  184 medicamentos esenciales  5 política de drogas europea  44 grupo consultivo de expertos  3 ejecuciones extrajudiciales  9 fair trade  3 fentanilo  5 francia  70 fumigación  50 teorí­a de entrada  6 alemania  47 comisión global  44 grecia  4 guatemala  40 iniciativa de guatemala  56 reducción de daños  184 cáñamo  7 heroína  17 tratamiento asistido con heroína  15 VIH/SIDA  41 autocultivo  209 honduras  5 derechos humanos  108 encarcelación  48 JIFE  122 india  5 diálogos informales sobre drogas  19 inter se modification  5 israel  10 italia  13 jamaica  20 ketamina  4 khat  5 kratom  5 debate américa latina  195 cumplimiento de la ley  169 líbano  4 euforizantes legales  11 legalización  876 luxembourg  17 malta  5 marihuana medicinal  300 metanfetamina  3 méxico  362 estimulantes ligeros  12 lavado de dinero  28 marruecos  86 naloxone  1 holanda  91 new york  8 nueva zelanda  6 noruega  1 NPS  3 encuesta de opinión  47 opioides  10 opio  51 oregón  6 panama  1 paraguay  19 patentes  1 paz  72 perú  98 peyote  1 filipinas  5 pilot project  31 policía pacificadora  15 portugal  59 prevención  2 situación carcelaria  124 prohibicíon  68 proporcionalidad  102 psychedelics  2 psicosis  7 puerto rico  1 reclasificación  52 recriminalización  45 regulación  987 rusia  3 sacramental use  1 safe supply  1 crack más seguro  37 scheduling  14 scientific research  8 sdg  2 seguridad  19 imposición de penas  54 social justice  21 sudáfrica  1 españa  476 san vicente y las granadinas  1 tratamiento de sustitución  29 suiza  66 tributación  25 tailandia  3 cantidades umbral  56 productores  79 tramadol  1 tratamiento  7 túnez  5 reino unido  16 control de drogas ONU  373 UNGASS  57 UNODC  68 uruguay  517 política de drogas estadounidense  305 venezuela  5 violencia  107 OMS  36 informe mundial sobre drogas  8

Este sitio web

UN Drug Control

In 2011 the 1961 UN Single Convention on drugs will be in place for 50 years. In 2012 the international drug control system will exist 100 years since the International Opium Convention was signed in 1912 in The Hague. Does it still serve its purpose or is a reform of the UN Drug Conventions needed? This site provides critical background.

Drug Law Reform on the map

dlronthemap_und

Copyright © 2024 Drug Law Reform in Latin America

Website by WebWolf